Ready to hire?
Post your job in minutes, browse real reviews and choose who to speak to.Post a jobNeed some tips or advice?
Ask a questionPlumbing
Plumber Work, Still Not Working Properly but Wants Payment
Anonymous user 09/03/2024 - 3.32 PM
An issue my parents have now with plumber demanding payment for works when boiler still not working. Boiler stopped working at my parents house over Christmas, I reset the boiler then all was ok for a few hours before the boiler stopped working again. So they decided to find a plumber but struggled to get a plumber out that time of the year, so defaulted to the plumber who initially installed the boiler 11 years previously. Here are the details if what he says he did taken from the invoice. 1st visit - £90 - Find fault with boiler. Order part. 2nd visit - (2.5 hours) - £225 - Replace primary flow pipe. Service boiler (clean main burner condensate and test). 3rd visit (boiler stopped working so came out again) - £90 - Remove plate heat exchanger to clean primary flow pipe £30 Total to pay - £435 No where along the line was it ageeed to do what he did. No call out charge was ever explained. He went ahead on his own schedule & my parents went along with it, considering that he was used previously and he is a gas safe engineer with expertise in the make of that boiler. I have advised him that its still not working properly when he came to the house to get payment, saw that the boiler was working at the time of visit, only because we have to keep resetting the boiler daily (which maybe will damage the boiler in the medium/long term maybe), but he wasnt having any if it and said we had to pay. I even suggested that it could be to do with the wireless thermostat and/or receiver box, which i think is standard for a qualified plumber, but he didnt even look there. Need advice on what can be done as we dont believe we should pay anything if its still not working as before he even came. We are considering getting another plumber in to have a look and get a second opinion & if they fix it, then possibly reduce the payment to the demanding plumber for what we pay the 2nd plumber (to get him off my parents back), but even paying for the labour of the original plumber still makes it wrong as only the parts i think might be a reasonable compromise only. Why should we pay for work that was not needed. Let me know what you guys think. Thanks
Are you a tradesperson and able to answer this question?
4 Answers
A.c. Property maintenance
D. Miles Plumbing
AK Property Services
Heath Gas Services Ltd