Skip to main content

Ready to hire?

Post your job in minutes, browse real reviews and choose who to speak to.Post a job

Need some tips or advice?

Ask a question
Electrical

Bought a property with dangerous electrics - who is liable?

Anonymous user 28/02/2024 - 3.23 PM

18 months ago I bought a house from a man who lived at the residence but also acted under a company name to renovate the house before selling it to me. A couple of months ago I moved out and put the house on the market for rental. Before the tenants moved in an electrical inspection was conducted, which it completely failed, resulting in a bill of over £4,000. The failures ranged from a TT earth with no 100 MA main RCD switch, lighting circuits with either no CPC wire or the CPC wire being used as a live and no local isolation to the cooker to name but a few. As the building was extended for a new kitchen and an en suite was added, was the builder (or company he traded under) not obliged to meet safety requirements and building regs? Question: Is he at fault? Can I pursue this matter and if so, how do I go about it? Many thanks

Are you a tradesperson and able to answer this question?

3 Answers

Shorts electrical

Rating: 5 out of 5
Haverfordwest
I would probably say that you should have had the same inspection done when you bought it.
Answered28 September 2016
0

DEACON ELECTRICAL SERVICES

Rating: 5 out of 5
Grimsby
Yes, you should have had an EICR done on the installation BEFORE you bought it. Would have given you leverage on the price you were paying for it. Expensive lesson that.
Answered28 September 2016
0

3 Core Sparkies

Rating: 5 out of 5
Derby
I agree with Deacon Electrical. A Condition Report should have been done before purchasing. I am surprised your solicitor didn't bother either.
Answered29 September 2016
0